On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 5:27 AM, Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> wrote: > > My opinion is that we should stay an agnostic web-app so the downstream > consumers and end-users of Solr has a real choice. But at the same time > strive to make the built-in Jetty server work as well as possible OOTB (start > scripts etc) even to a degree that it is perfectly suitable for production > use. >
My opinion (said previously many times) is that whatever we decide to support: it *must* be tested. So if other containers are supported, then more than one must be tested. Then we know from running the tests if things are assuming container = Jetty. Otherwise, we only support Jetty in my eyes. I know the wiki used to say the release manager should go and manually test alternative containers before releasing: I refuse to do that. Its not the release manager's job. -- lucidimagination.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
