On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Dyer, James <james.d...@ingrambook.com> wrote: > On the other hand, expecting to test every possible container before you can > tell people its "supported" for a standards-compliant java web-app is just > crazy. This is like saying that DIH's SQLEntityProcessor is only supported > for HSQLDB because that's the one we test against, or that you can't run > Lucene on Solaris because Uwe's Jenkins doesn't have a Solaris environment. >
I don't think its crazy at all. Just like TimeZone/Codec/Locale/Directory impl, if Solr should be agnostic to it, then the test framework should rotate between different implementations and pass. As far as Lucene, we try to do this, sure we didnt have a Windows jenkins until recently, but we at least simulate its crazy filesystem semantics in all tests via MockDirectoryWrapper. Not even trying to do this kinda testing for anything but jetty = not supported. -- lucidimagination.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
