[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4173?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13414847#comment-13414847
]
David Smiley commented on LUCENE-4173:
--------------------------------------
bq. In addition the the class level javadoc, perhaps we can expand the
package.html with some tables of Strategys vs. supported shapes and vs.
supported operations. As long as we keep that up to date, it'll be a nice
reference.
+1 A comparison table in package.html is an awesome idea.
bq. This still poses the question of what to do in a Strategy when given a
Shape that is unsupported. Are you okay with the approach in the patch of just
throwing the Exception?
I am. +1.
> Remove IgnoreIncompatibleGeometry for SpatialStrategys
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-4173
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4173
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: modules/spatial
> Reporter: Chris Male
> Attachments: LUCENE-4173.patch
>
>
> Silently not indexing anything for a Shape is not okay. Users should get an
> Exception and then they can decide how to proceed.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
