[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4173?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13422633#comment-13422633
]
David Smiley commented on LUCENE-4173:
--------------------------------------
So we're definitely agreed ignoreIncompatibleGeometry should go away; great.
But you know what would be good instead, I think?
*coalesceIncompatibleGeometry*. If a strategy can only index points it will
get the center point of the given shape. If the strategy can only index
bounding boxes then it will index the bounding box of the given shape. Query
time is similar. This could go for both index & query. Some of the strategies
are doing this already. Assuming we like the coalesceIncompatibleGeometry
concept, is it true by default? I lean towards yes but I could go either way.
And maybe SpatialArgs has the boolean independently so the client can indicate
a different policy for query time?
> Remove IgnoreIncompatibleGeometry for SpatialStrategys
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-4173
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4173
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: modules/spatial
> Reporter: Chris Male
> Attachments: LUCENE-4173.patch
>
>
> Silently not indexing anything for a Shape is not okay. Users should get an
> Exception and then they can decide how to proceed.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
