How about logback rather than log4j?   
<http://logback.qos.ch/reasonsToSwitch.html>

        Erik

On Mar 15, 2013, at 12:38 , Ryan McKinley wrote:

> We have discussed a few times shipping with or supporting log4j rather then 
> defaulting to JUL
> 
> I just updated SOLR-3706 to do this.
> 
> What are peoples thoughts on this issue now?
> 
> Thanks
> Ryan
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to