On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Ryan McKinley <[email protected]> wrote: > Looking at SOLR-3706, there are really two issues that need consensus: > > 1. The default logging framework shipped in the examples
After dealing with JUL, I understand the appeal of alternatives. IMO, we should simply go with the best alternative today (or perhaps look slightly ahead to what will be the best alternative soon). > 2. Removing an explicit logging framework from solr.war As long as the server works out of the box (i.e. /example), this doesn't matter to me. I'm in the "solr is a server" camp, and not "solr is a WAR" ;-) -Yonik http://lucidworks.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
