logback is great too I'm happy with any of them -- assuming we stick to SLF4j bindings
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Erik Hatcher <[email protected]>wrote: > How about logback rather than log4j? < > http://logback.qos.ch/reasonsToSwitch.html> > > Erik > > On Mar 15, 2013, at 12:38 , Ryan McKinley wrote: > > > We have discussed a few times shipping with or supporting log4j rather > then defaulting to JUL > > > > I just updated SOLR-3706 to do this. > > > > What are peoples thoughts on this issue now? > > > > Thanks > > Ryan > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
