[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13605049#comment-13605049
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4848:
-------------------------------------
I would be against it myself. It seems users cannot even manage open/close on
IndexReader and IndexWriter today. So its too much that they would have to
close() scorers, docsenum, and so on.
Personally i'm not worried about ClosedByInterruptExceptions: just dont
interrupt threads doing searches. I'm also not willing to pay the cost of
additional file handles if i'm not interrupt()'ing...why should i?
But to me this is all unrelated to this issue, its been discussed over and over
elsewhere and the problem already exists today.
> Add Directory implementations using NIO2 APIs
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-4848
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4848
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Michael Poindexter
> Assignee: Uwe Schindler
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: jdk7directory.zip
>
>
> I have implemented 3 Directory subclasses using NIO2 API's (available on
> JDK7). These may be suitable for inclusion in a Lucene contrib module.
> See the mailing list at http://lucene.markmail.org/thread/lrv7miivzmjm3ml5
> for more details about this code and the advantages it provides.
> The code is attached as a zip to this issue. I'll be happy to make any
> changes requested. I've included some minimal smoke tests, but any help in
> how to use the normal Lucene tests to perform more thorough testing would be
> appreciated.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
