Github user NightOwl888 commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/179
  
    Okay, this is ready for review/merge now. I have synced it up with the 
master branch already, so there are some commits you have already reviewed 
here. But you can merge the master branch into your analysis-work branch (you 
might want to make a backup) to filter them out of the review.
    
    About 95% of Analysis.Common is passing all tests. Of the 45 failing tests 
(out of 1405), the Synonym and Th namespaces account for most of the failures. 
But there is enough working functionality here that people will find it useful.
    
    Hunspell took quite a bit of time to get working right, but in the end I 
ended up using the pure 4.8.0 implementation without any of the enhancements of 
more recent versions of Lucene. I discovered that the dictionary files are easy 
to find if you search for the file names on http://www.filewatcher.com/. There 
are also [several FTP 
sites](https://github.com/NightOwl888/lucenenet/blob/4d7b23c4269f0348a37fd470a3339befc64332ec/src/Lucene.Net.Tests.Analysis.Common/Analysis/Hunspell/TestAllDictionaries.cs#L34-L36)
 where you can grab the OpenOffice dictionaries. As was done in Java, the 
dictionary binaries are not part of the repository, and if you want to test 
Hunspell with real dictionaries you must enable the tests manually and download 
the dictionaries yourself. 
    



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Reply via email to