both pmd and findbugs though seem to have eclipse and intellij plugins though. I'll check them out.
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <[email protected]> wrote: > "In practice, the rate of false warnings reported by FindBugs is > generally less than 50%" > > which probably disqualifies it as a hard build stopper if 30-ish% is noise.. > > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Robin Anil <[email protected]> wrote: >> pmd does have static analysis >> http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-pmd-plugin/ >> use findbugs as well http://mojo.codehaus.org/findbugs-maven-plugin/ >> ------ >> Robin Anil >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Robin, >>> what maven plugin does that? PMD? >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Robin Anil <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > Can we just focus on the bugs first. Its more useful to get static >>> analysis >>> > in and make that a build blocker. Checkstyle is secondary and is a >>> > sensitive topic. >>> > >>> > Robin >>> > >>> > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Jeff Eastman < >>> [email protected]>wrote: >>> > >>> >> +1 I feel the same way as Dmitriy >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On 6/11/12 6:39 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> which is why i am saying it would be easier to decouple code tools >>> >>> from environment. That is, put them into the build process . >>> >>> >>> >>> if we could relax some of the checks on top of it to degree they >>> >>> actually agree with sun style autoformatter in eclipse, that would be >>> >>> super-great (those are mostly things like spaces in comments and some >>> >>> wrapping choices which are for some reason construed differently by >>> >>> checkstyle and eclipse styles). I don't think there are many, if, >>> >>> perhaps, any at any given checkstyle settings. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Ted Dunning<[email protected]> >>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> I don't want to ignite a flame war since (a) and (b) are sufficient >>> >>>> grounds >>> >>>> to stay with whatever you like to use, but >>> >>>> >>> >>>> c) I am not convinced of this >>> >>>> >>> >>>> d) IntelliJ has a free edition that works great. You can also get the >>> >>>> full >>> >>>> version for free for use on open source projects. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Like I said, this doesn't change your deep motor training. I would >>> point >>> >>>> out that I have been through more generations of editing environments >>> >>>> than >>> >>>> I can count over the last 35 years and while it has always been >>> >>>> unpleasant >>> >>>> to change, changing to the next big thing has generally been >>> worthwhile. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov<[email protected]> >>> >>>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>> >>>> And no, i am not ready to part with eclipse yet. a) years of reflexes >>> >>>>> hard to beat. b) it is the only environment that has a lot of other >>> >>>>> integrations that I use such as StatET (integrated R step-by-step >>> >>>>> debugger& help). c) faster native visuals. d) free. >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov<[email protected]> >>> >>>>> wrote: >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>>> Yeah eclipse is a problem. Or checkstyle configuration. or both. >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> I used to set up the checkstyle plugin that highlights the problems >>> >>>>>> but i never managed to get it to 0 since it contradicts sun >>> >>>>>> recommended formatting as set in eclipse styles (or even with >>> >>>>>> adjustments). So both tools aimed at style actually contradict each >>> >>>>>> other on what the right style is. Which tells me both are probably >>> >>>>>> overzealous in their assertion since apparently those assertions >>> are a >>> >>>>>> subject of contention among authors of those tools. >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> Eclipse concerns can be partially set aside if the maven build fails >>> >>>>>> and reports why it fails so I don't have to check in and wait for >>> >>>>>> Jenkins to shove it into my face. >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 7:31 AM, Jeff Eastman >>> >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> On 6/11/12 7:39 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> It may take me a few days. >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> How much do people care about Eclipse integration? Can I ignore >>> that >>> >>>>>>>> for the moment? >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> -1 No, I think Eclipse integration is important but I will devote >>> >>>>>>> some >>> >>>>>>> energy to helping here if I can >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>>
