I think that getting it into the existing API would be very nice to have, but not absolutely critical.
If extending the release by, say, 2-3 weeks would solve the problem I would recommend extending. Otherwise, we might want to have yet another API enter the mix and do an 0.8.1 with the new API. On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Dan Filimon <[email protected]>wrote: > I'm working on the new clustering and I'm concerned the end of > February is too early for a good quality RC. > I say this because I haven't integrated it into the existing framework yet. > > What do you think Ted? > > On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[email protected]> > wrote: > > +1 on new clustering. I'd like to get Frank's Lucene storage stuff in > to, now that we are on 4.1. I'm willing to be the release manager. How > about we put in a date of cutting an RC by end of Feb? > > > > On Feb 2, 2013, at 5:33 AM, Sebastian Schelter wrote: > > > >> I also think that 0.8 should include the new clustering stuff, I recall > >> we wanted even release numbers to contain new features. I plan a hack > >> evening in Berlin with Isabel and Zeno (who ported some of his code from > >> http://mymedialite.net/) in the next 2 weeks. We'll have another pass > >> over the new recommenders to finalize them for 0.8. > >> > >> Best, > >> Sebastian > >> > >> On 02.02.2013 10:01, Ted Dunning wrote: > >>> Sounds good to me. Dan should have the new clustering stuff inserted > soon. > >>> That was all I was after. > >>> > >>> We should probably noodle a bit about how to update the MiA examples > since > >>> that keeps coming up on the list. My first thought (from Ellen) is > that > >>> asking Alex Ott to repeat his fabulous tech review work, possibly with > some > >>> monetary incentive might be a good route to getting a bug list. > >>> > >>> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>>> Seems we have accumulated a good # of fixes these days. Should we > start > >>>> thinking about cutting a 0.8 soon? > >>>> > >>>> -Grant > >>>> > >>> > >> > > > > -------------------------------------------- > > Grant Ingersoll > > http://www.lucidworks.com > > > > > > > > >
