How are we doing on the Streaming K-Means and other 0.8 issues? I'm still willing to be RM for 0.8, but I will need to plan for it a bit.
On Feb 5, 2013, at 2:13 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov wrote: > I guess i have nothing to report for this release. Hence 0. > > > > On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Jeff Eastman > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> +1 >> >> >> On 2/4/13 8:45 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: >> >>> +1. >>> >>> On Feb 3, 2013, at 7:48 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: >>> >>> Fine by me. >>>> >>>> Others? >>>> >>>> On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Dan Filimon <[email protected] >>>>> **wrote: >>>> >>>> I can get back to work starting on February 11. That's 3 weeks to get >>>>> the existing code in shape. >>>>> It might be a bit of a stretch. >>>>> >>>>> How about aiming for something like March 8 for the RC? >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I think that getting it into the existing API would be very nice to >>>>>> have, >>>>>> but not absolutely critical. >>>>>> >>>>>> If extending the release by, say, 2-3 weeks would solve the problem I >>>>>> >>>>> would >>>>> >>>>>> recommend extending. Otherwise, we might want to have yet another API >>>>>> enter the mix and do an 0.8.1 with the new API. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Dan Filimon < >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm working on the new clustering and I'm concerned the end of >>>>>>> February is too early for a good quality RC. >>>>>>> I say this because I haven't integrated it into the existing framework >>>>>>> >>>>>> yet. >>>>> >>>>>> What do you think Ted? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 on new clustering. I'd like to get Frank's Lucene storage stuff >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> in >>>>> >>>>>> to, now that we are on 4.1. I'm willing to be the release manager. >>>>>>> How >>>>>>> about we put in a date of cutting an RC by end of Feb? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Feb 2, 2013, at 5:33 AM, Sebastian Schelter wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I also think that 0.8 should include the new clustering stuff, I >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> recall >>>>> >>>>>> we wanted even release numbers to contain new features. I plan a hack >>>>>>>>> evening in Berlin with Isabel and Zeno (who ported some of his code >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> from >>>>> >>>>>> http://mymedialite.net/) in the next 2 weeks. We'll have another >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> pass >>>>> >>>>>> over the new recommenders to finalize them for 0.8. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>> Sebastian >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 02.02.2013 10:01, Ted Dunning wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Sounds good to me. Dan should have the new clustering stuff >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> inserted >>>>> >>>>>> soon. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That was all I was after. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> We should probably noodle a bit about how to update the MiA >>>>>>>>>> examples >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> since >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> that keeps coming up on the list. My first thought (from Ellen) is >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> asking Alex Ott to repeat his fabulous tech review work, possibly >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> with >>>>> >>>>>> some >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> monetary incentive might be a good route to getting a bug list. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Grant Ingersoll < >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Seems we have accumulated a good # of fixes these days. Should we >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> start >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> thinking about cutting a 0.8 soon? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -Grant >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------**-------------- >>>>>>>> Grant Ingersoll >>>>>>>> http://www.lucidworks.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ------------------------------**-------------- >>> Grant Ingersoll | @gsingers >>> http://www.lucidworks.com >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> -------------------------------------------- Grant Ingersoll | @gsingers http://www.lucidworks.com
