Fine for me as well. On 04.02.2013 05:08, Jake Mannix wrote: > ~march 8 sounds fine by me as well. > > > On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Fine by me. >> >> Others? >> >> On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Dan Filimon <[email protected] >>> wrote: >> >>> I can get back to work starting on February 11. That's 3 weeks to get >>> the existing code in shape. >>> It might be a bit of a stretch. >>> >>> How about aiming for something like March 8 for the RC? >>> >>> On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>> I think that getting it into the existing API would be very nice to >> have, >>>> but not absolutely critical. >>>> >>>> If extending the release by, say, 2-3 weeks would solve the problem I >>> would >>>> recommend extending. Otherwise, we might want to have yet another API >>>> enter the mix and do an 0.8.1 with the new API. >>>> >>>> On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Dan Filimon < >> [email protected] >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I'm working on the new clustering and I'm concerned the end of >>>>> February is too early for a good quality RC. >>>>> I say this because I haven't integrated it into the existing framework >>> yet. >>>>> >>>>> What do you think Ted? >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> +1 on new clustering. I'd like to get Frank's Lucene storage stuff >>> in >>>>> to, now that we are on 4.1. I'm willing to be the release manager. >> How >>>>> about we put in a date of cutting an RC by end of Feb? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Feb 2, 2013, at 5:33 AM, Sebastian Schelter wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I also think that 0.8 should include the new clustering stuff, I >>> recall >>>>>>> we wanted even release numbers to contain new features. I plan a >> hack >>>>>>> evening in Berlin with Isabel and Zeno (who ported some of his code >>> from >>>>>>> http://mymedialite.net/) in the next 2 weeks. We'll have another >>> pass >>>>>>> over the new recommenders to finalize them for 0.8. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>> Sebastian >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 02.02.2013 10:01, Ted Dunning wrote: >>>>>>>> Sounds good to me. Dan should have the new clustering stuff >>> inserted >>>>> soon. >>>>>>>> That was all I was after. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We should probably noodle a bit about how to update the MiA >> examples >>>>> since >>>>>>>> that keeps coming up on the list. My first thought (from Ellen) >> is >>>>> that >>>>>>>> asking Alex Ott to repeat his fabulous tech review work, possibly >>> with >>>>> some >>>>>>>> monetary incentive might be a good route to getting a bug list. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Grant Ingersoll < >>> [email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Seems we have accumulated a good # of fixes these days. Should >> we >>>>> start >>>>>>>>> thinking about cutting a 0.8 soon? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -Grant >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -------------------------------------------- >>>>>> Grant Ingersoll >>>>>> http://www.lucidworks.com >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>> >> > > >
