I guess i have nothing to report for this release. Hence 0.
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Jeff Eastman <[email protected]>wrote: > +1 > > > On 2/4/13 8:45 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > >> +1. >> >> On Feb 3, 2013, at 7:48 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: >> >> Fine by me. >>> >>> Others? >>> >>> On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Dan Filimon <[email protected] >>> >**wrote: >>> >>> I can get back to work starting on February 11. That's 3 weeks to get >>>> the existing code in shape. >>>> It might be a bit of a stretch. >>>> >>>> How about aiming for something like March 8 for the RC? >>>> >>>> On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I think that getting it into the existing API would be very nice to >>>>> have, >>>>> but not absolutely critical. >>>>> >>>>> If extending the release by, say, 2-3 weeks would solve the problem I >>>>> >>>> would >>>> >>>>> recommend extending. Otherwise, we might want to have yet another API >>>>> enter the mix and do an 0.8.1 with the new API. >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Dan Filimon < >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I'm working on the new clustering and I'm concerned the end of >>>>>> February is too early for a good quality RC. >>>>>> I say this because I haven't integrated it into the existing framework >>>>>> >>>>> yet. >>>> >>>>> What do you think Ted? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 on new clustering. I'd like to get Frank's Lucene storage stuff >>>>>>> >>>>>> in >>>> >>>>> to, now that we are on 4.1. I'm willing to be the release manager. >>>>>> How >>>>>> about we put in a date of cutting an RC by end of Feb? >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Feb 2, 2013, at 5:33 AM, Sebastian Schelter wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I also think that 0.8 should include the new clustering stuff, I >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> recall >>>> >>>>> we wanted even release numbers to contain new features. I plan a hack >>>>>>>> evening in Berlin with Isabel and Zeno (who ported some of his code >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> from >>>> >>>>> http://mymedialite.net/) in the next 2 weeks. We'll have another >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> pass >>>> >>>>> over the new recommenders to finalize them for 0.8. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>> Sebastian >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 02.02.2013 10:01, Ted Dunning wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Sounds good to me. Dan should have the new clustering stuff >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> inserted >>>> >>>>> soon. >>>>>> >>>>>>> That was all I was after. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We should probably noodle a bit about how to update the MiA >>>>>>>>> examples >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> since >>>>>> >>>>>>> that keeps coming up on the list. My first thought (from Ellen) is >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> that >>>>>> >>>>>>> asking Alex Ott to repeat his fabulous tech review work, possibly >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> with >>>> >>>>> some >>>>>> >>>>>>> monetary incentive might be a good route to getting a bug list. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Grant Ingersoll < >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Seems we have accumulated a good # of fixes these days. Should we >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> start >>>>>> >>>>>>> thinking about cutting a 0.8 soon? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -Grant >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------**-------------- >>>>>>> Grant Ingersoll >>>>>>> http://www.lucidworks.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------**-------------- >> Grant Ingersoll | @gsingers >> http://www.lucidworks.com >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
