Hello John, > > You're right about the ZDNet article. I've posted a 'caveat emptor' > comment. > > On the SF website the Openoffice.org premium people state > "OpenOffice.org Premium is a free and open source enhancement of > official OpenOffice.org" which is a pretty fair description. > > I think this is something we have to learn to live with. I'm not too > enthusiastic about the alternatives - I have some "Thread Linux" CDs > from the days when RedHat started threatening legal action against > anyone who distributed RedHat software on CD and called it "RedHat"... > Yes. You know, Kami and the Hu.NL project are good folks, it's just that sometimes, they hit the language barrier, I and others hit it as well, so we remain stuck in the : "your stuff is cool, we know you don't mean no harm, you just do something positive, but hey, the premium thing in the name is somewhat of a problem". And then, you're stucked there trying to explain what is so bad about the word premium. Another thing: these folks are really part of the OOo community and don't do that for money, prestige or anything, they just do it for fun and because it's useful.
thanks for the caveat emptor, John. Best, Charles. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
