Hi,
On the grounds of number of pages, MS OOXML must be better than ODF ;-)
totally non sense
and yes, developpers guide is really well documented and not complicated
just have to read and be able to browse a Table of content
Btw, i totally agree that we need as many helpers as possible
but i just wanted to say that it is wrong to say it is poorly documented
They probably have other priorities. I know at least one developer that
would not want to develop for OOo specifically but might well do things
that are indirectly beneficial to the project. Flexibility and lowering
barriers to participation are key issues in attracting more support.
Please try to follow what is going on at OOo project level
One part of the Extensions project is dedicated to this lowering
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Extensions
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Extensions_development
(any contrinutor to this doc part is welcommed)
and if you want to write bindings and helper functions, you're welcome
extensions are technically suitable for this
sigh - this is my last email on this thread
Laurent
--
Laurent Godard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Ingénierie OpenOffice.org -
http://www.indesko.com
Nuxeo Enterprise Content Management >> http://www.nuxeo.com -
http://www.nuxeo.org
Livre "Programmation OpenOffice.org", Eyrolles 2004-2006
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
