On Wed, 06 Dec 2006 06:14:41 -0600, Laurent Godard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
and if you want to write bindings and helper functions, you're welcome
extensions are technically suitable for this
sigh - this is my last email on this thread
Laurent
Hi Laurent,
Unfortunately this whole thread has focused on documentation, while the
main point is on targeting developer communities. As a developer I guess
we could focus more on what we DO have from what we lack.
I think there are many resources spread over the OOo-related sites, if
there is a way to focus it so new developers might want to jump in, it
would be a great gain for both, marketing and extension project.
I guess one of the questions related to PyUNO is if there is a space
within the Extension project dedicated to PyUNO. I know that PyUNO was
settle more on the UDK mailing lists, however I am not very knowledgable
if there are more resources on the wiki.
Another more development oriented proposal is to include this abstraction
modules on the distribution of OOo. This will benefit everyone since it
will make the API easier to work on but also will make it compatible
across the board without needing to install the extra library modules.
I dont think this is a difficult thing since this modules have already
been worked up and packaged for easy implementation on the source tree.
However I am not sure how easy or difficult is to make this pass the core
developers. You have succesfully include your Dictionary Wizard on the
source tree of OOo. How easy/hard is to include this extra python modules
in it?
--
Alexandro Colorado
Grupo de Usuarios Linux Tabasco
http://www.gultab.org
OpenOffice.org
Community Contact // Mexico
http://www.openoffice.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
