El 18/05/10 14:38, Miroslav Mazel escribió: > I have to disagree with you there. There's rarely a case in which ignoring > the opinions of the community is going to be helpful to your business -- > going against your customers is never good. Especially if the software is > free and open-source. Oracle has done a great job with OpenOffice.org and > VirtualBox, and I trust it. And even if Oracle started to abuse its grip on > its software somehow, anyone could take the code and make his own, unabusive > branch. That's one of the perks of open-source.
I do not think I explained my position well. :-( I think it is only one or many corporations add to a project like this. But that first start with the same from the community. When corporations start projects usually do not do 100% free (as in freedom). But tailored to their business plans. Do not you think it's best to start and show an idea to then call to work? Creo que no expliqué bien mi posición. :-( Me parece bien que se sume una o muchas corporaciones a un proyecto como este. Pero que primero se comience con el mismo desde la comunidad. Cuando las corporaciones inician los proyectos, no suelen hacerlo 100% libres (como en libertad). Sino ajustados a sus planes de negocios. ¿no cree que es mejor comenzar y mostrar una idea para después llamar a que colaboren? -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Prof. Román H. Gelbort Hagamos Cultura y Software Libres entre todos ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
