Hi this idea it's really interesting! @Raffaele: if you need some help for this, I'll be glad to help!
Alfredo Serafini 2015-03-20 10:41 GMT+01:00 Sergio Fernández <[email protected]>: > Hi Raffaele, > > AFAIK Tinkerpop Blueprints already provides a Sesame SAIL implementation: > > https://github.com/tinkerpop/blueprints/wiki/Sail-Implementation > > Therefore the implementation of a new backend for Marmotta is completely > feasible. You'd just need to implement org.apache.marmotta.platform. > core.api.triplestore.StoreProvider on top of their SAIL interface. > > So, if you are interested, just go for prototyping the sail. You have some > documentation at: > > http://marmotta.apache.org/platform/backends > > If you need further support, I guess the code is the best where to look. > > Cool! > > Cheers, > > > On 19/03/15 18:13, Raffaele Palmieri wrote: > >> Clearly, when I talk about Tinkerpop Blueprints, I refer to [1] and, among >> the compatibile projects, to Sail ouplementation and Accumulo >> Implementation. >> Cheers, >> Raffaele. >> >> [1] https://github.com/tinkerpop/blueprints/wiki >> >> Il giovedì 19 marzo 2015, Raffaele Palmieri <[email protected]> >> ha scritto: >> >> Dear all, >>> I would want to resume the discussion on the possibility of extending >>> Marmotta >>> to use other compatible backends with Blueprints model, as the work done >>> for Titan. >>> I ask if anyone has done more tests for Titan backend, to understand the >>> limits of Marmotta, which should be the same that we will have if we >>> introduce another compatible backend with Blueprints. >>> Particularly I am seeing some projects that use Apache Accumulo as triple >>> store for Blueprints. >>> What do you think? >>> Raffaele. >>> >>> >> > -- > Sergio Fernández > Partner Technology Manager > Redlink GmbH > m: +43 660 2747 925 > e: [email protected] > w: http://redlink.co >
