It is a little strange that blueprints would have that as a policy. It should 
be simple to keep the previous implementation working even if it isn't inside 
of tinkerpop.

Cheers,

Peter 

> On 20 Mar 2015, at 9:47 pm, Raffaele Palmieri <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hi to all,
> 
> @Sergio I think that it would be more beneficial to look at sail
> ouplementation[1], because we don't want to manipulate RDF Store with
> Blueprints, but we want to do the opposite.
> 
> The project I was looking is present at [2], we should declare our intent
> to the owners of project, the license should be Apache and so compatible,
> but a check should be made.
> The same goes for Tinkerpop Blueprints, if the licenses aren't compatible
> we could need to make a custom release, compiling manually from the source
> code.
> 
> @Alfredo You can give a look to the project at [3] , where Titan Graph DB
> has been integrated in Marmotta; integration mode should be very similar.
> 
> Cheers,
> Raffaele.
> 
> [1] https://github.com/tinkerpop/blueprints/wiki/Sail-Ouplementation
> 
> [2] https://github.com/JHUAPL/AccumuloGraph
> 
> [3] https://github.com/vigsterkr/marmotta-titan/
> 
> 
> 2015-03-20 11:07 GMT+01:00 Alfredo Serafini <[email protected]>:
> 
>> Hi this idea it's really interesting!
>> 
>> @Raffaele: if you need some help for this, I'll be glad to help!
>> 
>> 
>> Alfredo Serafini
>> 
>> 
>> 2015-03-20 10:41 GMT+01:00 Sergio Fernández <[email protected]>:
>> 
>>> Hi Raffaele,
>>> 
>>> AFAIK Tinkerpop Blueprints already provides a Sesame SAIL implementation:
>>> 
>>> https://github.com/tinkerpop/blueprints/wiki/Sail-Implementation
>>> 
>>> Therefore the implementation of a new backend for Marmotta is completely
>>> feasible. You'd just need to implement org.apache.marmotta.platform.
>>> core.api.triplestore.StoreProvider on top of their SAIL interface.
>>> 
>>> So, if you are interested, just go for prototyping the sail. You have
>> some
>>> documentation at:
>>> 
>>> http://marmotta.apache.org/platform/backends
>>> 
>>> If you need further support, I guess the code is the best where to look.
>>> 
>>> Cool!
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On 19/03/15 18:13, Raffaele Palmieri wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Clearly, when I talk about Tinkerpop Blueprints, I refer to [1] and,
>> among
>>>> the compatibile projects, to Sail ouplementation and Accumulo
>>>> Implementation.
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Raffaele.
>>>> 
>>>> [1] https://github.com/tinkerpop/blueprints/wiki
>>>> 
>>>> Il giovedì 19 marzo 2015, Raffaele Palmieri <
>> [email protected]>
>>>> ha scritto:
>>>> 
>>>> Dear all,
>>>>> I would want to resume the discussion on the possibility of extending
>>>>> Marmotta
>>>>> to use other compatible backends with Blueprints model, as the work
>> done
>>>>> for Titan.
>>>>> I ask if anyone has done more tests for Titan backend, to understand
>> the
>>>>> limits of Marmotta, which should be the same that we will have if we
>>>>> introduce another compatible backend with Blueprints.
>>>>> Particularly I am seeing some projects that use Apache Accumulo as
>> triple
>>>>> store for Blueprints.
>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>> Raffaele.
>>> --
>>> Sergio Fernández
>>> Partner Technology Manager
>>> Redlink GmbH
>>> m: +43 660 2747 925
>>> e: [email protected]
>>> w: http://redlink.co
>> 

Reply via email to