Hi Raffaele, No, Blueprints has a BSD-license, so that is okay for Apache to reuse, AFAIK.
I was just referring to the unusual step where Blueprints changed from supporting Sail backends a while back, to only support a Sail frontend now, and have a policy against having a Sail backend integrated. Cheers, Peter On 21 March 2015 at 03:59, Raffaele Palmieri <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Peter, do you refer to the license? I've seen that Tinkerpop3 has Apache > License, but Blueprints has a different one, > cheers, > Raffaele. > > 2015-03-20 11:58 GMT+01:00 Peter Ansell <[email protected]>: > >> It is a little strange that blueprints would have that as a policy. It >> should be simple to keep the previous implementation working even if it >> isn't inside of tinkerpop. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Peter >> >> > On 20 Mar 2015, at 9:47 pm, Raffaele Palmieri < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Hi to all, >> > >> > @Sergio I think that it would be more beneficial to look at sail >> > ouplementation[1], because we don't want to manipulate RDF Store with >> > Blueprints, but we want to do the opposite. >> > >> > The project I was looking is present at [2], we should declare our intent >> > to the owners of project, the license should be Apache and so compatible, >> > but a check should be made. >> > The same goes for Tinkerpop Blueprints, if the licenses aren't compatible >> > we could need to make a custom release, compiling manually from the >> source >> > code. >> > >> > @Alfredo You can give a look to the project at [3] , where Titan Graph DB >> > has been integrated in Marmotta; integration mode should be very similar. >> > >> > Cheers, >> > Raffaele. >> > >> > [1] https://github.com/tinkerpop/blueprints/wiki/Sail-Ouplementation >> > >> > [2] https://github.com/JHUAPL/AccumuloGraph >> > >> > [3] https://github.com/vigsterkr/marmotta-titan/ >> > >> > >> > 2015-03-20 11:07 GMT+01:00 Alfredo Serafini <[email protected]>: >> > >> >> Hi this idea it's really interesting! >> >> >> >> @Raffaele: if you need some help for this, I'll be glad to help! >> >> >> >> >> >> Alfredo Serafini >> >> >> >> >> >> 2015-03-20 10:41 GMT+01:00 Sergio Fernández <[email protected]>: >> >> >> >>> Hi Raffaele, >> >>> >> >>> AFAIK Tinkerpop Blueprints already provides a Sesame SAIL >> implementation: >> >>> >> >>> https://github.com/tinkerpop/blueprints/wiki/Sail-Implementation >> >>> >> >>> Therefore the implementation of a new backend for Marmotta is >> completely >> >>> feasible. You'd just need to implement org.apache.marmotta.platform. >> >>> core.api.triplestore.StoreProvider on top of their SAIL interface. >> >>> >> >>> So, if you are interested, just go for prototyping the sail. You have >> >> some >> >>> documentation at: >> >>> >> >>> http://marmotta.apache.org/platform/backends >> >>> >> >>> If you need further support, I guess the code is the best where to >> look. >> >>> >> >>> Cool! >> >>> >> >>> Cheers, >> >>> >> >>> >> >>>> On 19/03/15 18:13, Raffaele Palmieri wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> Clearly, when I talk about Tinkerpop Blueprints, I refer to [1] and, >> >> among >> >>>> the compatibile projects, to Sail ouplementation and Accumulo >> >>>> Implementation. >> >>>> Cheers, >> >>>> Raffaele. >> >>>> >> >>>> [1] https://github.com/tinkerpop/blueprints/wiki >> >>>> >> >>>> Il giovedì 19 marzo 2015, Raffaele Palmieri < >> >> [email protected]> >> >>>> ha scritto: >> >>>> >> >>>> Dear all, >> >>>>> I would want to resume the discussion on the possibility of extending >> >>>>> Marmotta >> >>>>> to use other compatible backends with Blueprints model, as the work >> >> done >> >>>>> for Titan. >> >>>>> I ask if anyone has done more tests for Titan backend, to understand >> >> the >> >>>>> limits of Marmotta, which should be the same that we will have if we >> >>>>> introduce another compatible backend with Blueprints. >> >>>>> Particularly I am seeing some projects that use Apache Accumulo as >> >> triple >> >>>>> store for Blueprints. >> >>>>> What do you think? >> >>>>> Raffaele. >> >>> -- >> >>> Sergio Fernández >> >>> Partner Technology Manager >> >>> Redlink GmbH >> >>> m: +43 660 2747 925 >> >>> e: [email protected] >> >>> w: http://redlink.co >> >> >>
