Hi Peter, do you refer to the license? I've seen that Tinkerpop3 has Apache License, but Blueprints has a different one, cheers, Raffaele.
2015-03-20 11:58 GMT+01:00 Peter Ansell <[email protected]>: > It is a little strange that blueprints would have that as a policy. It > should be simple to keep the previous implementation working even if it > isn't inside of tinkerpop. > > Cheers, > > Peter > > > On 20 Mar 2015, at 9:47 pm, Raffaele Palmieri < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi to all, > > > > @Sergio I think that it would be more beneficial to look at sail > > ouplementation[1], because we don't want to manipulate RDF Store with > > Blueprints, but we want to do the opposite. > > > > The project I was looking is present at [2], we should declare our intent > > to the owners of project, the license should be Apache and so compatible, > > but a check should be made. > > The same goes for Tinkerpop Blueprints, if the licenses aren't compatible > > we could need to make a custom release, compiling manually from the > source > > code. > > > > @Alfredo You can give a look to the project at [3] , where Titan Graph DB > > has been integrated in Marmotta; integration mode should be very similar. > > > > Cheers, > > Raffaele. > > > > [1] https://github.com/tinkerpop/blueprints/wiki/Sail-Ouplementation > > > > [2] https://github.com/JHUAPL/AccumuloGraph > > > > [3] https://github.com/vigsterkr/marmotta-titan/ > > > > > > 2015-03-20 11:07 GMT+01:00 Alfredo Serafini <[email protected]>: > > > >> Hi this idea it's really interesting! > >> > >> @Raffaele: if you need some help for this, I'll be glad to help! > >> > >> > >> Alfredo Serafini > >> > >> > >> 2015-03-20 10:41 GMT+01:00 Sergio Fernández <[email protected]>: > >> > >>> Hi Raffaele, > >>> > >>> AFAIK Tinkerpop Blueprints already provides a Sesame SAIL > implementation: > >>> > >>> https://github.com/tinkerpop/blueprints/wiki/Sail-Implementation > >>> > >>> Therefore the implementation of a new backend for Marmotta is > completely > >>> feasible. You'd just need to implement org.apache.marmotta.platform. > >>> core.api.triplestore.StoreProvider on top of their SAIL interface. > >>> > >>> So, if you are interested, just go for prototyping the sail. You have > >> some > >>> documentation at: > >>> > >>> http://marmotta.apache.org/platform/backends > >>> > >>> If you need further support, I guess the code is the best where to > look. > >>> > >>> Cool! > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> > >>> > >>>> On 19/03/15 18:13, Raffaele Palmieri wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Clearly, when I talk about Tinkerpop Blueprints, I refer to [1] and, > >> among > >>>> the compatibile projects, to Sail ouplementation and Accumulo > >>>> Implementation. > >>>> Cheers, > >>>> Raffaele. > >>>> > >>>> [1] https://github.com/tinkerpop/blueprints/wiki > >>>> > >>>> Il giovedì 19 marzo 2015, Raffaele Palmieri < > >> [email protected]> > >>>> ha scritto: > >>>> > >>>> Dear all, > >>>>> I would want to resume the discussion on the possibility of extending > >>>>> Marmotta > >>>>> to use other compatible backends with Blueprints model, as the work > >> done > >>>>> for Titan. > >>>>> I ask if anyone has done more tests for Titan backend, to understand > >> the > >>>>> limits of Marmotta, which should be the same that we will have if we > >>>>> introduce another compatible backend with Blueprints. > >>>>> Particularly I am seeing some projects that use Apache Accumulo as > >> triple > >>>>> store for Blueprints. > >>>>> What do you think? > >>>>> Raffaele. > >>> -- > >>> Sergio Fernández > >>> Partner Technology Manager > >>> Redlink GmbH > >>> m: +43 660 2747 925 > >>> e: [email protected] > >>> w: http://redlink.co > >> >
