The question is wherever we make the upgrade scrips run only if the extension is installed, or we just move the geosparql support to a separate maven artifact.
What other people would prefer? On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 6:56 PM, Sergio Fernández <[email protected]> wrote: > First test I wanted to do (starting with a clean environment, no postgis > installed, small db) the schema upgrade fails. Find log attached. I'll go > though it with more time and provide you detailed feedback. > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 6:24 PM, Sergio Fernández <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi Francisco, >> >> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 6:14 PM, FRANCISCO XAVIER SUMBA TORAL < >> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I have understood that to apply the patch. The code must compile and >>> does what it claims in the issue and, all license header must be in place. >>> Then Have I to apply the patch after two days? >>> >> >> The current path looks fine. I just want some time to check some things. >> I'll come back to you as soon as I finish my last review, and then you can >> attach the patch to the issue as formal submission of your work. >> >> >>> For sure, It would be great. Here I can gain experience and contribute >>> to people with a long career. So for me and other people involved in the >>> project it would be a honor. >> >> >> That would be great! Let's keep talking. >> >> Cheers, >> >> >> -- >> Sergio Fernández >> Partner Technology Manager >> Redlink GmbH >> m: +43 6602747925 >> e: [email protected] >> w: http://redlink.co >> > > > > -- > Sergio Fernández > Partner Technology Manager > Redlink GmbH > m: +43 6602747925 > e: [email protected] > w: http://redlink.co > -- Sergio Fernández Partner Technology Manager Redlink GmbH m: +43 6602747925 e: [email protected] w: http://redlink.co
