Final evaluation submitted. Congratulations, Francisco! On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:52 PM, Sergio Fernández <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:37 PM, Rob Vesse <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 20/08/2015 12:41, "Sergio Fernández" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >Maybe I explain it wrong. As I commented in the commit >> > >> https://github.com/cuent/marmotta/commit/498265077af240956b9caea090ae9895e >> >ac35c54 >> >the patch must not be in the source code repository, but attached to >> >the MARMOTTA-584 jira issue as a formal grant. >> >> Why? >> > > In that commit he added a patch file to the PR. That file is redundant, > and not useful at all. > > >> Is this a GSoC specific restriction >> >> The Apache License specifically states that any contributions are >> implicitly under the Apache License unless the contributor explicitly >> states otherwise so unless there is a GSoC specific requirement a pull >> request should be more than sufficient especially if you have GitHub PR >> integration enabled so the JIRA will be automatically linked with the PR >> > > No, no GSoC specific, just old-school ip grant. I wrote that methodology > before we had the github integration in place. Although personally I like > to have stored the patch in ASF infrastructure, even if I'll use the PR to > get the source contribution. > > -- > Sergio Fernández > Partner Technology Manager > Redlink GmbH > m: +43 6602747925 > e: [email protected] > w: http://redlink.co > -- Sergio Fernández Partner Technology Manager Redlink GmbH m: +43 6602747925 e: [email protected] w: http://redlink.co
