yes, it seems perfectly adapted: yes, what was thought as beautification seems to cause trouble And beautification of comments is not really a string feature :)
thank you for your efforts and accepting discussions on first commits: once again, welcome :) Regards, Hervé Le samedi 12 décembre 2015 12:12:11 Christian Schulte a écrit : > Am 12/12/15 um 11:52 schrieb Hervé BOUTEMY: > > what means "a directive" in markdown? fml? confluence? LaTex? xdoc? > > I know "directive" word is more generic than "ssi", but the only useful > > case I know is when generated html is put on a web server that supports > > such directives > > then just handling this special comment on xhtml Sink implementation looks > > an adapted hack IMHO > > > > Enhancing Sink API is not forbidden: it just requires to have a good > > meaning in most supported formats [1], both when parsing and generating > > markup > The cause for having to do anything is the (wrong IMHO) handling of > comments. If I can updated/fix that, nothing needs to be changed. That > just means no more trimming when parsing comments and no more addition > of whitespace when writing. So that "<!--# whatever -->" will be parsed > to "# whatever " and written as "<!--# whatver -->" and "<!-- # > whatever-->" will be parsed to " # whatever" and will be written as > "<!-- # whatever-->". So after that change comments will be passed > through unchanged. I would need to update some test cases testing the > current handling for this. Would that be ok? > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
