Thanks for the reminder. :-)

Working well:
1. Strong release lead
2. CI in better shape
3. Good momentum (right now)

Not working well:
1. Scope slipping. "Just one more small thing..."
2. Not a shared view on version meaning (e.g. what's a bug fix release?)
3. Hard to keep up on ML discussions based on issue number (missing context)

Stephen, hats off to you for taking the lead on this release. Having one
person keeping things together for a release is very important IMHO.

/Anders

On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:19 PM, Stephen Connolly <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Gentle reminder. If you can see this thread, you are entitled to
> contribute. This thread is about discovering where the Maven project can
> improve how we work in order to grow our community.
>
> Everyone's opinions are welcome...
>
> We just ask that at this phase you just provide up to 3 sentences on areas
> where we work well and up to 3 sentences on areas where we don't (in your
> view of the order of importance)
>
> On 11 March 2017 at 21:56, Stephen Connolly <stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.
> com
> > wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I think it is a good thing if we take stock of where we are and how we
> are
> > doing. I would really appreciate if everyone could take a few minutes to
> > respond with their top three of two areas:
> >
> > * What is working well
> >
> > * What is not working well
> >
> > I'll consolidate the responses after 72h and see if there are any themes
> > that can be identified
> >
> > On the stuff that is not working well, I'll try and pick the three most
> > popular themes, we can then have a round of discussion on those three
> > themes to see if anyone has any ideas to improve those aspects of how we
> > work and hopefully we can have some votes to change things for the
> better.
> >
> > By the way, this is open to anyone in any way what so ever involved with
> > the Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1 effort (assuming you are paying attention to the
> > dev list ;-) )
> >
> > Thanks in advance for your time,
> >
> > -Stephen
> >
> > P.S. As alpha-2 is near, I'll probably wait until after 3.5.0 before I
> try
> > this again (assuming people like this idea)
> >
>

Reply via email to