You are mixing two things: 1. IDE enhancement (incremental support or whatever you want) -> it is generally good IMHO 2. Need of an API to handle that -> this is not needed at all and IDE can already catch this data in a more relevant manner than adding an API which wouldn't be embraced anyway before ~10 years at least by the *community* (= no way IDE get the feature if you impl it this way in practise)
So yes, this kind of API is definitively a bad thing IMHO but the feature behind is welcomed - but once again does not need any maven change. Le lun. 26 sept. 2022 à 19:23, Konrad Windszus <k...@apache.org> a écrit : > Probably a misunderstanding then. It sounded a bit like you deny the > benefit of having an API for incremental builds and IDE integration in > general. > But good that we are on the same page that as an opt-in API this is > definitely a good thing to have. > > Konrad > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > >
