The API exists since 2009, so we are not talking about a new thing here. Also some things IMHO cannot be expressed with plain Mojo/Maven API (like line number, column or file where error/warning occurred). So let's focus the discussion rather on the concrete API/proposal for extension. Konrad
On 2022/09/26 17:53:54 Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > You are mixing two things: > > 1. IDE enhancement (incremental support or whatever you want) -> it is > generally good IMHO > 2. Need of an API to handle that -> this is not needed at all and IDE can > already catch this data in a more relevant manner than adding an API which > wouldn't be embraced anyway before ~10 years at least by the *community* (= > no way IDE get the feature if you impl it this way in practise) > > So yes, this kind of API is definitively a bad thing IMHO but the feature > behind is welcomed - but once again does not need any maven change. > > Le lun. 26 sept. 2022 à 19:23, Konrad Windszus <k...@apache.org> a écrit : > > > Probably a misunderstanding then. It sounded a bit like you deny the > > benefit of having an API for incremental builds and IDE integration in > > general. > > But good that we are on the same page that as an opt-in API this is > > definitely a good thing to have. > > > > Konrad > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
