Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 20.10.2006 10:35:18: > Jason van Zyl wrote on Thursday, October 19, 2006 11:14 PM: > > > > I think skipping release numbers is Bad Thing(tm). It would certainly > > confuse users if we release Maven 2.0.7 next. > > Anything > 2.0.4 would be welcome ... hehehe > > Technically you could simply use an additional number at the end: > > maven-2.0.5.x > > And if final 2.0.5 is in the end 2.0.5.4 ... who cares? You might > also call x the build number, so Maven 2.0.5 would be e.g. maven-2. > 0.5.4711 ... done so by Windows for a long time. The only thing
What's wrong with 2.0.4711? Isn't it "major.minor.patchlevel"? I see no reason to add another level which doesn't add any useful information. The confusion of users would only happen if there was no hint what happened to 2.0.6, so we just need a complete changelog. Regards, -- Aaron Digulla --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
