On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
> > On Nov 29, 2012, at 1:22 AM, Stephane Nicoll <stephane.nic...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I would go for 2.2. Releasing something and then include it as the > default > > version the same day seems a bit too much for me. > > I would agree with this. The fact that I was the first one to even notice > that 2.3 has issues on the Mac suggests it's not very widely tested. :-( > I'm using it and noticed this annoying icon but I though it was related to some tests executions. What I would like is to release a 2.3.1 ASAP if everybody is agree After that I agree to not put it in 3.1 if we have too many doubts about its quality > > Much like the compiler plugin, I'd let this bake a little more before > making it the default. > +1 Using it too but I didn't find nor good nor bad changes about it. In my case the new incremental stuff is never called thus it works like before. > > Dan > Arnaud
