On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:

>
> On Nov 29, 2012, at 1:22 AM, Stephane Nicoll <stephane.nic...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I would go for 2.2. Releasing something and then include it as the
> default
> > version the same day seems a bit too much for me.
>
> I would agree with this.  The fact that I was the first one to even notice
> that 2.3 has issues on the Mac suggests it's not very widely tested.  :-(
>

I'm using it and noticed this annoying icon but I though it was related to
some tests executions.
What I would like is to release a 2.3.1 ASAP if everybody is agree
After that I agree to not put it in 3.1 if we have too many doubts about
its quality


>
> Much like the compiler plugin, I'd let this bake a little more before
> making it the default.
>

+1
Using it too but I didn't find nor good nor bad changes about it. In my
case the new incremental stuff is never called thus it works like before.


>
> Dan
>

Arnaud

Reply via email to