Hi Arnaud and Dan, Arnaud Héritier wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote: > >> >> On Nov 29, 2012, at 1:22 AM, Stephane Nicoll <stephane.nic...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > I would go for 2.2. Releasing something and then include it as the >> default >> > version the same day seems a bit too much for me. >> >> I would agree with this. The fact that I was the first one to even >> notice >> that 2.3 has issues on the Mac suggests it's not very widely tested. :-( >> > > I'm using it and noticed this annoying icon but I though it was related to > some tests executions. > What I would like is to release a 2.3.1 ASAP if everybody is agree I'll deploy a new XStream SNAPSHOT this evening, where you might test if this problem still occurs. > After that I agree to not put it in 3.1 if we have too many doubts about > its quality > >> >> Much like the compiler plugin, I'd let this bake a little more before >> making it the default. >> > > +1 > Using it too but I didn't find nor good nor bad changes about it. In my > case the new incremental stuff is never called thus it works like before. Cheers, Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
