2012/11/29 Mark Derricutt <m...@talios.com>: > Really? We want to allow different mojos to use different loggers? > > That just sounds like an invitation to confusion where the output of maven > logging may appear in multiple places, files. > > Just with normal logging - it's not what the developer wants to use/prefer, > its what the USER prefers. agree. But we must try (not sure how :-) ) to not break as it's the case here with the sonar plugin (I didn't have a look so no idea what is the real issue here) > > Unless I'm missing some reasoning behind this... > > > Olivier Lamy wrote: >> >> My point is: we must first try to find a solution to not export core >> slf4j-impl to plugins. >> AFAIK users and/or mojo developpers are free to use slf4j-impl they want. >> We must not force them to use A impl whereas they prefer B or the last >> "à la mode" impl. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org >
-- Olivier Lamy Talend: http://coders.talend.com http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
