Le 29 nov. 2012 19:09, "Jason van Zyl" <ja...@tesla.io> a écrit : > > That's a good example. It's SLF4J and Logback in the wild which is what I > expected. Good find. Arffff easy and fast conclusion ! The issue can happend with any other plugin using any other slf4j impl.
My point is: we must first try to find a solution to not export core slf4j-impl to plugins. AFAIK users and/or mojo developpers are free to use slf4j-impl they want. We must not force them to use A impl whereas they prefer B or the last "à la mode" impl. > > https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-5393 > > On Nov 29, 2012, at 9:38 AM, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote: > > > fyi I just raised http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SONAR-3983 > > But we must have a look if we can fix that on our side as it's > > probably not the only case. > > > > > > 2012/11/29 Jörg Schaible <joerg.schai...@scalaris.com>: > >> Hi Arnaud and Dan, > >> > >> Arnaud Héritier wrote: > >> > >>> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>>> On Nov 29, 2012, at 1:22 AM, Stephane Nicoll <stephane.nic...@gmail.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> I would go for 2.2. Releasing something and then include it as the > >>>> default > >>>>> version the same day seems a bit too much for me. > >>>> > >>>> I would agree with this. The fact that I was the first one to even > >>>> notice > >>>> that 2.3 has issues on the Mac suggests it's not very widely tested. :-( > >>>> > >>> > >>> I'm using it and noticed this annoying icon but I though it was related to > >>> some tests executions. > >>> What I would like is to release a 2.3.1 ASAP if everybody is agree > >> > >> I'll deploy a new XStream SNAPSHOT this evening, where you might test if > >> this problem still occurs. > >> > >>> After that I agree to not put it in 3.1 if we have too many doubts about > >>> its quality > >>> > >>>> > >>>> Much like the compiler plugin, I'd let this bake a little more before > >>>> making it the default. > >>>> > >>> > >>> +1 > >>> Using it too but I didn't find nor good nor bad changes about it. In my > >>> case the new incremental stuff is never called thus it works like before. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Jörg > >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Olivier Lamy > > Talend: http://coders.talend.com > > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > > > Thanks, > > Jason > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Jason van Zyl > Founder & CTO, Sonatype > Founder, Apache Maven > http://twitter.com/jvanzyl > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Simplex sigillum veri. (Simplicity is the seal of truth.) > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
