At times, we close issues as "Won't Fix" but leave the version number on it. I can understand why someone might do that, but I think it creates more confusion than good. For example, we publish the JIRA ticket on the Maven site for each new version -- but without status, I think it's normal for people to believe all these tickets were fixed.
What do you all think of agreeing to remove the version if it is "Won't Fix"? If it's not being fixed, the "Fix Version" really loses its meaning. Don't forget we always have the "Affects Version" to track what version it was reported against. -- Cheers, Paul
