Done. There were a few tickets also "Incomplete" and "Not a Bug" and "Cannot Reproduce" statuses. Those are all conceptually the same thing as "Won't Fix" in regards to not taking any development action. So 7 tickets got moved out of the 3.2 report list, which will greatly help our users on what work was actually accomplished.
Cheers, Paul On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Paul Benedict <[email protected]> wrote: > Okay, I can go through the 3.2 tickets and do that unless someone objects. > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Anders Hammar <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I agree. >> >> /Anders (mobile) >> Den 29 jan 2014 18:24 skrev "Paul Benedict" <[email protected]>: >> >> > At times, we close issues as "Won't Fix" but leave the version number on >> > it. I can understand why someone might do that, but I think it creates >> more >> > confusion than good. For example, we publish the JIRA ticket on the >> Maven >> > site for each new version -- but without status, I think it's normal for >> > people to believe all these tickets were fixed. >> > >> > What do you all think of agreeing to remove the version if it is "Won't >> > Fix"? If it's not being fixed, the "Fix Version" really loses its >> meaning. >> > Don't forget we always have the "Affects Version" to track what version >> it >> > was reported against. >> > >> > -- >> > Cheers, >> > Paul >> > >> > > > > -- > Cheers, > Paul > -- Cheers, Paul
