Okay, I can go through the 3.2 tickets and do that unless someone objects.
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Anders Hammar <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree. > > /Anders (mobile) > Den 29 jan 2014 18:24 skrev "Paul Benedict" <[email protected]>: > > > At times, we close issues as "Won't Fix" but leave the version number on > > it. I can understand why someone might do that, but I think it creates > more > > confusion than good. For example, we publish the JIRA ticket on the Maven > > site for each new version -- but without status, I think it's normal for > > people to believe all these tickets were fixed. > > > > What do you all think of agreeing to remove the version if it is "Won't > > Fix"? If it's not being fixed, the "Fix Version" really loses its > meaning. > > Don't forget we always have the "Affects Version" to track what version > it > > was reported against. > > > > -- > > Cheers, > > Paul > > > -- Cheers, Paul
