Thank, Paul. On Jan 29, 2014, at 5:05 PM, Paul Benedict <[email protected]> wrote:
> Done. There were a few tickets also "Incomplete" and "Not a Bug" and > "Cannot Reproduce" statuses. Those are all conceptually the same thing as > "Won't Fix" in regards to not taking any development action. So 7 tickets > got moved out of the 3.2 report list, which will greatly help our users on > what work was actually accomplished. > > Cheers, > Paul > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Paul Benedict <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Okay, I can go through the 3.2 tickets and do that unless someone objects. >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Anders Hammar <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I agree. >>> >>> /Anders (mobile) >>> Den 29 jan 2014 18:24 skrev "Paul Benedict" <[email protected]>: >>> >>>> At times, we close issues as "Won't Fix" but leave the version number on >>>> it. I can understand why someone might do that, but I think it creates >>> more >>>> confusion than good. For example, we publish the JIRA ticket on the >>> Maven >>>> site for each new version -- but without status, I think it's normal for >>>> people to believe all these tickets were fixed. >>>> >>>> What do you all think of agreeing to remove the version if it is "Won't >>>> Fix"? If it's not being fixed, the "Fix Version" really loses its >>> meaning. >>>> Don't forget we always have the "Affects Version" to track what version >>> it >>>> was reported against. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Cheers, >>>> Paul >>>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> Paul >> > > > > -- > Cheers, > Paul Thanks, Jason ---------------------------------------------------------- Jason van Zyl Founder, Apache Maven http://twitter.com/jvanzyl http://twitter.com/takari_io --------------------------------------------------------- A man enjoys his work when he understands the whole and when he is responsible for the quality of the whole -- Christopher Alexander, A Pattern Language
