> On Jan. 18, 2014, 1:32 a.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
> > include/mesos/mesos.proto, lines 134-137
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/15542/diff/11/?file=426622#file426622line134>
> >
> >     s/bytes/string on these two
> >     
> >     The resulting 'executor.command.command.command' is a bit unfortunate, 
> > do you foresee other fields in Command?
> >     
> >     If not, let's just directly embed it in CommandInfo:
> >     
> >     message CommandInfo {
> >       // Setting value is equivalent to:
> >       //   command = 'sh'
> >       //   arguments = ['-c', value]
> >       //
> >       // Deprecated, please use 'command' and 'arguments' instead.
> >       required string value = 3;
> >     
> >       optional string command = 4;
> >       repeated string arguments = 5;
> >     }
> >     
> >     It seems that this makes the API a bit cleaner to use, how does this 
> > sound?

I will make the switch from 'bytes' to 'string' as you have suggested. I have 
some doubts about it -- my intuition suggests this will create vexing 
limitations sometimes -- but many of my fears are allayed by the fact that 
Protobuf specifies strings as UTF-8.


- Jason


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15542/#review32234
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Jan. 21, 2014, 6:50 a.m., Jason Dusek wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/15542/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 21, 2014, 6:50 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman, Ben Mahler, and Niklas Nielsen.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Offer an execvp like interface for running tasks.
> 
> Review: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15542
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/mesos.proto 655f86757487ddbe551fdcf53eb793e773ecdd34 
>   src/examples/python/test_framework.py 
> deca48e779ae099424fa73bb9a8ac5c419c5faf1 
>   src/launcher/executor.cpp b73ab479500a7347a38ba53acecfab9229f1080d 
>   src/launcher/launcher.cpp d5ab66704429a95eeb8eda5188e33d8e691221af 
>   src/launcher/main.cpp de64609905ee63096c0173fe7e64a1eafea5d6bf 
>   src/slave/process_isolator.cpp 0bc698f04f7c8eaad166dc9d646e13310129dd01 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15542/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Ran Python test executor and `make check`.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jason Dusek
> 
>

Reply via email to