> On Feb. 12, 2014, 2:02 a.m., Tom Arnfeld wrote:
> > src/slave/containerizer/pluggable_containerizer.cpp, line 595
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/17567/diff/2/?file=482402#file482402line595>
> >
> >     Does this method assume killing the external containerizer process will 
> > successfully kill the container? In the case of docker, if you kill the 
> > `docker run` call it will certainly kill cleanly, but the container is 
> > still running. You need to execute a `docker kill XXX` command to cleanly 
> > kill the running container (which will exit non-0 if it fails).
> 
> TILL TOENSHOFF wrote:
>     Let me describe the now updated way of handling this situation;
>     We are sending a "destroy" command to the containerizer plugin first. The 
> plugin is then responsible to answer that command-request with a status. Once 
> that status has been received the PluggableContainerizer will signal a 
> SIGTERM (with SIGTERM elevation) towards the plugin.
>     
>     So the addition basically is a "wait for result/response" on destroy, 
> allowing for synchronized flows.
>     
>     Would that fit your needs?

That makes sense. I've also realised this workflow is fine now that i've 
implemented own containerizer.


> On Feb. 12, 2014, 2:02 a.m., Tom Arnfeld wrote:
> > src/slave/containerizer/pluggable_containerizer.hpp, line 140
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/17567/diff/2/?file=482401#file482401line140>
> >
> >     This seems a little odd to me... surely a 0 exit code should suggest a 
> > successful invoke no matter what the external containerizer writes to 
> > stdout?
> 
> TILL TOENSHOFF wrote:
>     Within the updated implementation, we now expect protobuffed result 
> messages for all commands.

Awesome! That's really great.


- Tom


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17567/#review34249
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 18, 2014, 6:35 p.m., TILL TOENSHOFF wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/17567/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 18, 2014, 6:35 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Niklas Nielsen.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-816
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-816
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This patch adds the so-called pluggable containerizer. This
> containerizer delegates all containerizer calls directly to
> an external containerizer program (which can be specified on
> start-up). Few calls have internal fall-back implementations
> such as wait(), destroy() and usage().
> The protocol for the interactions with the external program
> is as follows:
> ./containerizer <command> <container-id> (<optional parameters>)
> When protocol buffers need to be provided, the Mesos side of
> the pluggable containerizer will serialize the protos on stdin
> and vice-versa for reading protos on stdout.
> 
> 
> NOTE: Still work in progress and not yet reviewable.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   configure.ac a8bc8a8 
>   include/mesos/mesos.proto 69a4a60 
>   src/Makefile.am 768c66a 
>   src/examples/python/test-containerizer.in PRE-CREATION 
>   src/examples/python/test_containerizer.py PRE-CREATION 
>   src/slave/containerizer/containerizer.hpp d9ae326 
>   src/slave/containerizer/containerizer.cpp d0a1023 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos_containerizer.hpp ee1fd30 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos_containerizer.cpp 6d990cb 
>   src/slave/containerizer/pluggable_containerizer.hpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/slave/containerizer/pluggable_containerizer.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/slave/flags.hpp e4d98a5 
>   src/slave/slave.hpp d82d4e9 
>   src/slave/slave.cpp 8ad955a 
>   src/slave/status_update_manager.cpp a88bb18 
>   src/tests/containerizer.hpp 5686398 
>   src/tests/containerizer.cpp bfb9341 
>   src/tests/mesos.cpp 98333a7 
>   src/tests/pluggable_containerizer_test.cpp PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17567/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> TILL TOENSHOFF
> 
>

Reply via email to