> On March 14, 2014, 6:13 a.m., Benjamin Hindman wrote:
> > 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/os/permissions.hpp, line 47
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/19093/diff/3/?file=518206#file518206line47>
> >
> >     One of these things is not like the other. ;) I'd like to make two 
> > suggestions:
> >     
> >     (1) Replace 'readable', 'writeable', and 'executable' with 'r', 'w', 
> > and 'x' respectively and keep 'rwx'.
> >     
> >     (2) Replace 'rwx' with 'all' (or another name you find more natural).
> >     
> >     Even though (1) is a bit more esoteric I still think it's easier to 
> > grok than S_IRUSR, S_IWUSR, etc. and it's fairly reminiscent of using 
> > 'chmod' on the command line.
> >     
> >     What do you think?

I made (1), I agree on the consistency with 'chmod' usage.


- Isabel


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19093/#review37164
-----------------------------------------------------------


On March 14, 2014, 8:08 a.m., Isabel Jimenez wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/19093/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 14, 2014, 8:08 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Adam B, Benjamin Hindman, and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-1087
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1087
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Adding permissions check on credentials file and deleting TODO comment
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/Makefile.am 1075b46 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/os.hpp 3f475a4 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/os/permissions.hpp 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   src/master/master.cpp 2a40333 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19093/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Isabel Jimenez
> 
>

Reply via email to