-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28697/#review65519
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


The protobufs themselves look fine, but we'll need a lot more documentation on 
the proper way to use these fields together.


include/mesos/mesos.proto
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/28697/#comment108775>

    Maybe more important than listing the valid states would be to list the 
valid transitions for framework writers (maybe in a lengthier doc), since a 
framework cannot, for example, change "role=R, STATIC" to "role=R, DYNAMIC".



include/mesos/mesos.proto
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/28697/#comment108741>

    Should this be called ReservationType instead, in case we do want/need a 
true Reservation struct later?



include/mesos/mesos.proto
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/28697/#comment108774>

    About half of our protobuf enums start at 0, the others at 1. Do you have 
any reason to reserve 0 for later/NULL?



include/mesos/mesos.proto
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/28697/#comment108773>

    Framework writers will definitely need more documentation than this about 
dynamic reservations. Probably worth a separate subtask and review for a 
docs/reservations.md


- Adam B


On Dec. 16, 2014, 4:56 p.m., Michael Park wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/28697/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 16, 2014, 4:56 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Adam B, Benjamin Hindman, Ben Mahler, Jie Yu, and 
> Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-2137
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2137
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Adding new protobuf messages necessary to support dynamic reservations.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/mesos.proto 540071db64961466eb75c779b3ea6863f4594437 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28697/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Michael Park
> 
>

Reply via email to