> On Jan. 7, 2015, 11:45 p.m., Dominic Hamon wrote:
> > 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/net.hpp, line 1121
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/29288/diff/5/?file=808729#file808729line1121>
> >
> >     why pass in the family? is this temporary because we're not ready to 
> > support ipv6 throughout?

ip gets the ip from a specific interface. I think that we will need to specify 
the family type of this ip (we want the ipv4 or the ipv6 address from that 
interface).


- Evelina


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29288/#review67122
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Jan. 8, 2015, 3:44 p.m., Evelina Dumitrescu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/29288/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 8, 2015, 3:44 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman, Dominic Hamon, Joris Van 
> Remoortere, and Niklas Nielsen.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-1919
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1919
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Created the inner class Address encapsulated inside the IP class.
> The class uses a union with the in_addr and in6_addr fields.
> I considered that the The MasterInfo protobuffers should have both an ipv4 
> and an ipv6 field.
> I intend to use the same Classifiers, addition, removal and update of 
> container filters, but write different encode/decode functions for IPv4/ICMP 
> and IPv6/ICMPv6 because the processing of the protocol headers differ.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/net.hpp 
> 80578e2207d5436a4414f56417a0fee06ca9a7e9 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/tests/net_tests.cpp 
> 425132e5d7c3770be4a5a39feea5a2f22179b871 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29288/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Evelina Dumitrescu
> 
>

Reply via email to