> On Jan. 8, 2015, 11:27 a.m., Bernd Mathiske wrote:
> > src/docker/executor.cpp, line 165
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/29329/diff/1/?file=798951#file798951line165>
> >
> >     This cryptic statement is worth a comment (maybe mention "man waitpid"? 
> > Or mention higher up in this code that the status code is based on waitpid, 
> > which is not immediately evident in this scope.). 
> >     
> >     Also maybe add some more output to increase human parsing ease. For 
> > example: CHECK(WIFEXITED(s) || WIFSIGNALED(s)) << "status code: " << s;
> >     
> >     (I know you just copied this particular stretch of code (from 
> > executor.cpp). Is there a general rule that code can or should remain 
> > suboptimal if copied? Please feel free to drop this issue if this is the 
> > case.)

It is a general assumption across everywhere using subprocess, I can put it 
here again.


- Timothy


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29329/#review67035
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Jan. 6, 2015, 10:16 p.m., Timothy Chen wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/29329/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 6, 2015, 10:16 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Bernd Mathiske.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Add executor for docker containerizer, replaces the usage of command executor
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/Makefile.am 6f132b5a66e117c2a907763217bfafe1fce1b7a0 
>   src/docker/executor.cpp PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29329/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Timothy Chen
> 
>

Reply via email to