+1 for bi-weekly On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Michael Park <mcyp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We discussed whether the community syncs should be weekly or bi-weekly > (once every 2 weeks). > > There were differing opinions on the subject during the community sync > today. > > An argument for weekly: meetings can be shorter and missing a meeting won't > be as big a deal as missing a longer meeting. > > An argument for bi-weekly: there are many people involved in these > meetings, we should keep it infrequent so that it reduces people's time > commitments. > > This email is intended to capture your +1s or other ideas you might have! > > Thanks, > > MPark. > -- Best Regards, Haosdent Huang
