+1 for weekly.
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:41 AM, haosdent <haosd...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 for bi-weekly > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Michael Park <mcyp...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> We discussed whether the community syncs should be weekly or bi-weekly >> (once every 2 weeks). >> >> There were differing opinions on the subject during the community sync >> today. >> >> An argument for weekly: meetings can be shorter and missing a meeting won't >> be as big a deal as missing a longer meeting. >> >> An argument for bi-weekly: there are many people involved in these >> meetings, we should keep it infrequent so that it reduces people's time >> commitments. >> >> This email is intended to capture your +1s or other ideas you might have! >> >> Thanks, >> >> MPark. >> > > > > -- > Best Regards, > Haosdent Huang
