I agree with Daniel, +1 for weekly and we can re-evaluate in a bit to see
how people are liking it.

On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Guangya Liu <gyliu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 for bi-weekly
>
> Thanks,
>
> Guangya
>
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Daniel Mercer <dmer...@fantoccini.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 for weekly -- if this results in diminishing returns we can always
> reset
> > to biweekly.
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Kapil Arya <ka...@mesosphere.io> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 for bi-weekly.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Jan Schlicht <j...@mesosphere.io>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 for weekly.
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Artem Harutyunyan <
> > ar...@mesosphere.io>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 for weekly.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:41 AM, haosdent <haosd...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > +1 for bi-weekly
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Michael Park <mcyp...@gmail.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> We discussed whether the community syncs should be weekly or
> > > bi-weekly
> > > > > >> (once every 2 weeks).
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> There were differing opinions on the subject during the
> community
> > > sync
> > > > > >> today.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> An argument for weekly: meetings can be shorter and missing a
> > > meeting
> > > > > won't
> > > > > >> be as big a deal as missing a longer meeting.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> An argument for bi-weekly: there are many people involved in
> these
> > > > > >> meetings, we should keep it infrequent so that it reduces
> people's
> > > > time
> > > > > >> commitments.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> This email is intended to capture your +1s or other ideas you
> > might
> > > > > have!
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> MPark.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > > Haosdent Huang
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > *Jan Schlicht*
> > > > Distributed Systems Engineer, Mesosphere
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to