+1 for bi-weekly. On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Jan Schlicht <j...@mesosphere.io> wrote:
> +1 for weekly. > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Artem Harutyunyan <ar...@mesosphere.io> > wrote: > > > +1 for weekly. > > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:41 AM, haosdent <haosd...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 for bi-weekly > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Michael Park <mcyp...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > >> We discussed whether the community syncs should be weekly or bi-weekly > > >> (once every 2 weeks). > > >> > > >> There were differing opinions on the subject during the community sync > > >> today. > > >> > > >> An argument for weekly: meetings can be shorter and missing a meeting > > won't > > >> be as big a deal as missing a longer meeting. > > >> > > >> An argument for bi-weekly: there are many people involved in these > > >> meetings, we should keep it infrequent so that it reduces people's > time > > >> commitments. > > >> > > >> This email is intended to capture your +1s or other ideas you might > > have! > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> > > >> MPark. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Best Regards, > > > Haosdent Huang > > > > > > -- > *Jan Schlicht* > Distributed Systems Engineer, Mesosphere >
