I don't see any changes in your "Change 1". Am I missing it? What changed?
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 12:01 PM, James Sirota <[email protected]> wrote: > > Based on the discuss thread I propose the following changes: > > Change 1 - Replace: > > -1 – This is a negative vote. On issues where consensus is required, this > vote counts as a veto. Vetoes are only valid for code commits and must > include a technical explanation of why the veto is appropriate. Vetoes with > no or non-technical explanation are void. On issues where a majority is > required, -1 is simply a vote against. In either case, it may also be > appropriate for a -1 vote to include a proposed alternative course of > action. > > With > > -1 – This is a negative vote. On issues where consensus is required, this > vote counts as a veto. Vetoes are only valid for code commits and must > include a technical explanation of why the veto is appropriate. Vetoes with > no or non-technical explanation are void. On issues where a majority is > required, -1 is simply a vote against. In either case, it may also be > appropriate for a -1 vote to include a proposed alternative course of > action. > > Change 2 - Replace: > > A valid, binding veto cannot be overruled. If a veto is cast, it must be > accompanied by a valid reason explaining the reasons for the veto. The > validity of a veto, if challenged, can be confirmed by anyone who has a > binding vote. This does not necessarily signify agreement with the veto - > merely that the veto is valid. If you disagree with a valid veto, you must > lobby the person casting the veto to withdraw their veto. If a veto is not > withdrawn, any action that has already been taken must be reversed in a > timely manner. > > With: > > A valid, binding veto regarding a code commit cannot be overruled. If a > veto is cast, it must be accompanied by a valid technical explanation > giving the reasons for the veto. The technical validity of a veto, if > challenged, can be confirmed by anyone who has a binding vote. This does > not necessarily signify agreement with the veto - merely that the veto is > valid. If you disagree with a valid veto, you must lobby the person casting > the veto to withdraw their veto. If a veto is not withdrawn, any action > that has already been taken must be reversed in a timely manner. > > > Please vote +1, -1, 0 > > The vote will be open for 72 hours > > ------------------- > Thank you, > > James Sirota > PPMC- Apache Metron (Incubating) > jsirota AT apache DOT org > -- Nick Allen <[email protected]>
