Sorry, cut and paste error. Of course the original text currently says the following:
-1 – This is a negative vote. On issues where consensus is required, this vote counts as a veto. All vetoes must contain an explanation of why the veto is appropriate. Vetoes with no explanation are void. It may also be appropriate for a -1 vote to include an alternative course of action. 16.12.2016, 10:54, "Nick Allen" <[email protected]>: > I don't see any changes in your "Change 1". Am I missing it? What changed? > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 12:01 PM, James Sirota <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Based on the discuss thread I propose the following changes: >> >> Change 1 - Replace: >> >> -1 – This is a negative vote. On issues where consensus is required, this >> vote counts as a veto. Vetoes are only valid for code commits and must >> include a technical explanation of why the veto is appropriate. Vetoes with >> no or non-technical explanation are void. On issues where a majority is >> required, -1 is simply a vote against. In either case, it may also be >> appropriate for a -1 vote to include a proposed alternative course of >> action. >> >> With >> >> -1 – This is a negative vote. On issues where consensus is required, this >> vote counts as a veto. Vetoes are only valid for code commits and must >> include a technical explanation of why the veto is appropriate. Vetoes with >> no or non-technical explanation are void. On issues where a majority is >> required, -1 is simply a vote against. In either case, it may also be >> appropriate for a -1 vote to include a proposed alternative course of >> action. >> >> Change 2 - Replace: >> >> A valid, binding veto cannot be overruled. If a veto is cast, it must be >> accompanied by a valid reason explaining the reasons for the veto. The >> validity of a veto, if challenged, can be confirmed by anyone who has a >> binding vote. This does not necessarily signify agreement with the veto - >> merely that the veto is valid. If you disagree with a valid veto, you must >> lobby the person casting the veto to withdraw their veto. If a veto is not >> withdrawn, any action that has already been taken must be reversed in a >> timely manner. >> >> With: >> >> A valid, binding veto regarding a code commit cannot be overruled. If a >> veto is cast, it must be accompanied by a valid technical explanation >> giving the reasons for the veto. The technical validity of a veto, if >> challenged, can be confirmed by anyone who has a binding vote. This does >> not necessarily signify agreement with the veto - merely that the veto is >> valid. If you disagree with a valid veto, you must lobby the person casting >> the veto to withdraw their veto. If a veto is not withdrawn, any action >> that has already been taken must be reversed in a timely manner. >> >> Please vote +1, -1, 0 >> >> The vote will be open for 72 hours >> >> ------------------- >> Thank you, >> >> James Sirota >> PPMC- Apache Metron (Incubating) >> jsirota AT apache DOT org > > -- > Nick Allen <[email protected]> ------------------- Thank you, James Sirota PPMC- Apache Metron (Incubating) jsirota AT apache DOT org
