Maarten Bosteels wrote:
Hi Emmanuel,
Hi Marteen,
I don't really understand what you are complaining about ?
I just think that the mails posted to Ceki should have been sent as CC
to the MINA mailing list.
1) Asking Ceki to make all SLF4J implementations MDC-capable was
discussed on this mailing-list before.
see
http://www.nabble.com/result-poll-logging-frameworks-td13097527s16868.html#a13209806
quoting myself:
"In fact, I think this functionality could be added to SLF4J to make
all SLF4J implementations MDC-capable. I'll ask Ceki what he thinks
about it."
Nothing bad about asking Ceki something, but keep the Mina list CCed,
that's my point.
2) The proposal to remove the IoSessionLogger was discussed in the same thread
I'm ok with that, and I made no comment about that.
3) Announcing the fact that SLF4J accepted my patch and will have MDC
support for jul in the next version
was the very aim of this thread
(hence the title: "The new version of SLF4J is going to support MDC
for logging frameworks without MDC"
which actually should have been:
"The new version of SLF4J is going to support MDC for java.util.logging" )
Yes, but the mail content made it quite unclear that it was the only
purpose of this thread. Sorry if you misinterpreted my mail, my
intention was not to tell you that you have made a mistake, but to tell
that we should be _very_ careful when communicating on a matter which
has already created some noise.
So please explain me what went wrong according to you ?
Did I had clarified my position ?
Do you think that all my mails to the SLF4J mailing-list should have
been cross-posted to the MINA list ?
the answer is a clear 'yes'. Especially because we have had some
controversy about logs, but generally because the mailing list is the
only memory we have...
Nothing personal here, Martin, I'm just sure you did it on good faith,
I'm just trying to recall some general rules to every one. Sorry if my
wordings were incorrect...
Thanks !
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
